Liberalism, A Common Ideologies, Social Democracy And...

Liberalism is one of the two most common ideologies in the United States, with the other being conservatism, and the ideology that I identify with the most. The other two common ideologies, social democracy and libertarianism, are not brought up as often in politics, and as such, I will be talking about them minimally. According to the textbook, By The People: Debating American Government, liberalism is, â€Å"[rejecting] the idea that public officials should interfere in people’s private lives,† and being, â€Å"all for active government when it comes to economic policy or corporate regulation.†(Morone, Kersh, 2016, p.36). Liberalism is, in my words, the belief that government has little need to restrict certain behaviors or actions in the lives of its citizens, but instead that the time and money that would be spent on restricting these should go towards helping the economy or regulating the actions of companies. Some efforts that liberals have been working to wards are protecting the environment, limiting the actions of banks, and creating more government programs to help people who need it, or at least increasing funding for said programs. Liberals tend to work towards equality for all, whether it be equality of genders, of race, or minimizing the gaps between socioeconomic classes. Liberals are more accepting to new areas of science and new breakthroughs in science than conservatives, and science is the general path I see my life going on. As such, I feel like I fit in muchShow MoreRelatedTaking a Look at Political Ideologies684 Words   |  3 PagesIt’s an understatement to say our ideology shapes the way we live our lives every day. It affects the way we view and react to different people. Ideology is a set of beliefs that affects our outlook on the entire world. Most of the time ideology refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that relate to religious views. In a simpler meaning, ideology means having a views or opinions based on your ideas of that thing. The Republican ideology today is based on conservatism. They believeRead More The Conservative Movement Essay1540 Words   |  7 Pages and supporting republicanism. American conservatism has been characterized by competing ideologies and tension throughout history. The Americans who are politically liberal and economically conservative favor free trade, minimal state intervention, low taxes, and a small government. On the other hand, conservatives hold the view that American traditional values are normally undermined by secularism. Social conservatives have always opposed same-sex marriages and abortion, and instead have been supportingRead MoreNew World Order in Conspiracy Theory13987 Words   |  56 PagesWorld Order  or  NWO  refers to the emergence of a  bureaucratic collectivist  one-world government.[2][3][4][5][6] The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a secretive  power elite  with a  globalist  agenda is  conspiring  to eventually rule the world through an  authoritarian  world government, which replaces  sovereign  nation-states, and an all-embracing  ideology, which indoctrinates  cosmopolitanism. Significant occurrences in  politics  and  finance  are speculated to be orchestrated

Romeo and Juliet Compare and Contrast Free Essays

Compare and Contrast â€Å"Romeo and Juliet† is a story about two star crossed lovers who meet by fate. This great piece of literature written, by William Shakespeare will be compared with Baz Lurman’s rendition of â€Å"Romeo and Juliet†. The movie missed some details from the play it also added some extra scenes but it still contained the right mood and scenes for it to be a â€Å"Romeo and Juliet† movie. We will write a custom essay sample on Romeo and Juliet Compare and Contrast or any similar topic only for you Order Now A major similarity between the movie and play occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet act very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal which is a very intelligent thing to say. Similarly in the movie Romeo and Juliet both act serious. This is shown through there clothes, faces, and by the way they act. Romeo wears a suit, and Juliet wears a beautiful dress. Also you can tell by there faces that they look determined to get married and they both act very professional their not jumping around like 5 years olds their acting how people should be when they are getting married. A humongous difference between the play and movie is that Romeo is being chased by the police as he is making his way to Juliet’s resting place. In the play this never even happened he just got on a horse and went to the place. Lurman had to include put a chase in there, but that’s just one weird thing in this scene the other one is that Romeo takes a hostage because he gets surrounded by the police.This part was probably not expected by a lot people. Another deference is the ending of both the play and movie. In the play thinking that Juliet is dead, Romeo drinks some poison. When Juliet wakes up and discovering Romeo died she stabs herself with his dagger. They both lie next to each other, dead, and Juliet has yet another funeral, and Romeo has one too. Their families bury their differences and end their long feud. They also built a gold statue to honour Rome and Juliet.In contrast the movie ends with Romeo finding Juliet dead so he drinks the poison but this time Juliet wakes up: but Romeo has already drunken the poison so Juliet shoots her self in the head. Some people were not too happy about that. In conclusion the movie contained the necessary elements for it to be a fairly good adaptation of William Shakespeare’s play â€Å"Romeo and Juliet† but it missed details from the play and added a few details which may not be liked by all audiences. Both the play and movie are great. How to cite Romeo and Juliet Compare and Contrast, Papers

Asylum Seekers in Australia

Question: Discuss about theAsylum Seekers in Australia. Answer: Tutorial Debate: Mental Health/Aged Care: The aged people need sufficient medical care and so they need a proper health care institute which can provide them with utmost special needs and medical requirements. The refugees or the asylum seekers are being neglected in Australia and are being abused with a fear that they can harm the innocent people and can create a mess. The Australian government has failed to address any such law regarding the serious abuses and neglect that the Australians pose towards these asylum seekers (Bretherton Balvin, 2012). Hence transferring these detainees in the Australian health institutions might pose a life-threatening risk in the entire Australian community. In this context, it has been highlighted how the asylum seekers who are aged need to be transferred to the health institutions in Australia where they can be able to receive necessary and essential care treatment and medication whenever required. It is widely predominant that the aged people who are being forced to leave their country and are pushed to offshore detention centres as refugees, but are yet to be considered as refugees, fail to receive necessary medical help. As a matter of fact, the individuals become depressed and tend to harm own-selves which might even hamper their lives permanently. It has been perceived that lack of proper medical help or treatment has led many asylum seekers to commit suicide and harm themselves (Briskman, Goddard, Latham, 2008). In the offshore detention centres, they are not taken proper care of and as such depression and disabilities surround their lives and minds leading them to cause harm to themselves. Thus it is of utmost importance that these patients must be moved to the proper well recognised health care institutions in Australia where medical help can be properly provided to them. But on the contrary, some negative aspects in transferring these patients to the Australian health care homes can be highlighted. Many nurses might not have the skills to handle these patients which might be a problem for them. In fact, some medical institutions might not even have adequate remedial or precautionary measures that can help these asylum seekers to overcome their problems (Healey, 2013). The asylum seekers, as reported recently in The Sydney Morning Herald, have bashed their heads on walls and have also swallowed insect repellent due to depression. Thus the nurses of the Australian health care institutions might not be able to tackle these people, which can decrease the reputation and well being the care homes. Not only that, it has also been perceived that fresh questions have been raised over the implications of human rights of the tough border protection regime of Australia. But there is a positive side too. If the Australian health care institutions make space for these asylum seekers, then it can help the care homes to showcase their generosity and responsibilities towards these people thereby enabling them to gain recognition in the entire community. Whereas, the others argue that making way for the detainees can create conflicts and can hamper the other health related operations of the care institutions (Provera, 2013). Since there have been many detainees who tried to injure themselves being depressed and even attempted to commit suicide, the health care institutions do not want to take the risk of allowing these asylum seekers in their care home. They also feel that due to depression, they are harming themselves. But in the care institutions, when these asylum seekers will be around so many patients, it cannot be ascertained that the asylum seekers will not harm them. Hence as per the arguers, this can be a risk for the lives of the patients. The concept of liberalism has greatly affected the nursing education as depicted in the nursing literature from the year 1893 to 1923. The literature strongly focuses upon what does the nursing educators believe regarding the nature of the liberal education. Liberalism plays quite a significant role in the nursing education that indicates towards preserving the rights of every individual. In this case, it should not be forgotten that the asylum seekers also have the right to live their lives freely as per their terms. In order to do so, the nurses must aim at transferring the asylum seekers to the Australian health care institutions for providing them with all sorts of medical help and other care services (McNeill, 2003). The concept of deontology refers to the binding duty, which means the nurse have a certain duty to look after the individuals who need their support and help. Similarly the asylum seekers also need help from the nurses which they are likely to provide to them. On su ch note, according to the guidelines and nursing code of ethics, the nurses of the Australian health institutions must devote themselves in delivering care services to the asylum seekers. Being in the sub-par countries, it becomes difficult for the nurses to render proper treatment to the asylum seekers. As a matter of fact, the patients feel ignorant and neglected. Hence it is necessary to transfer the patients in the health institutions of Australia. References Bretherton, D. Balvin, N. (2012). Peace psychology in Australia. New York: Springer. Briskman, L., Goddard, C., Latham, S. (2008). Human rights overboard. Carlton North, Vic.: Scribe. Healey, J. (2013). Asylum seekers and immigration detention. Thirroul: The Spinney Press. McNeill, P. M. (2003). Public health ethics: asylum seekers and the case for political action.Bioethics,17, 487-503. Provera, M. (2013). The detention of asylum seekers in the European Union and Australia. Oisterwijk: Wolf Legal Publishers.

The Loss Of A President Essays - CubaUnited States Relations

The Loss Of A President November 22, 1963: The Loss of A President On November 22, 1963 at 12:30 P.M., the 35th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, was shot and killed while riding through the streets of Dallas, Texas in an open limousine with wife Jackie Kennedy, and Governor John Connally. This single event in history has created more controversy than any other. Still today, more than 27 years after the shooting, there is still speculation as to who killed John F. Kennedy. Today, so many possible theories remain, it is hard to determine what actually happened. Today many people believe that it was Lee Harvey Oswald that killed JFK. They believe that he was just a lone nut acting out of his own feelings, and he was not influenced by anyone else. Many others believe there was a conspiracy set up by the CIA to kill President Kennedy, and others believe that it was Communist Russians. In my paper I will try to explain some of the theories as clear as possible, and let you decide for yourself what you believe happened November 22, 1963. If Lee Harvey Oswald was not the assassin as thought, who else would possibly want the president dead? The Mafia Anti-Castro Cubans The CIA Communist Russians. When John F. Kennedy became president, he had many great ambitions. He wanted to pull more troops out of Vietnam and lessen the war effort, cut back on organized crime, end the Cuban Missile Crisis, and limit the power of the CIA. With these ambitions it is no surprise he made so many new enemies, some even being in the US government itself. Many of these new enemies he had found were very powerful, and would stop at nothing to see his new ways come to an end, even if it meant killing him. Shortly after the incident, the government founded the Warren Commission, and a government investigation began on the assassination. The Warren Commission was a group made of outstanding citizens to ascertain, evaluate and report upon the facts relating to the assassination ... and the subsequent violent death of the man charged with the assassination Lee Harvey Oswald. The Commission was instructed by the government to examine evidence brought forth to them by the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), or and any other organization or person. With the examination of the evidence, the Commission was then to make a decision on exactly what occurred that day. In under a week the Commission was able to come to the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswold was the lone assassin of the president. His actions were based on his personal instincts, and he was not working in anyway for any person or organization, whether it being a government agency or personnel. It was determined by the Commission that Oswold fired three shots at President Kennedy from the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository. The three shots were fired in a time period of 5.6 seconds, using a bolt-action 6.5 Italian Carbine rifle. The first shot Oswald fired was the magic bullet. The bullet was fired from Oswalds gun downward at a 17 degree angle, and hit Kennedy about halfway down his back. The bullet then moved upward where it exits through Kennedys throat, and then turns right and hits Connally behind his right armpit. It then moves downward, breaking and fragmenting part of his fifth rib, and then exits his chest from the right side. Then the bullet enters Connallys wrist and severs the Ulna nerve, exits his wrist and then gets lodged in Connallys thigh. All together the magic bullet made 7 wounds on President Kennedy and Governor Connally. The second shot fired missed Kennedy completely and hit an unsuspecting bystander, badly wounding him in the cheek. The third shot taken hit Kennedy in the back of the head, fatally wounding him. Many people believe this theory to be true, but still others are skeptical, and for good reason. On November 23, the paraffin test performed on Oswald came out negative for his right cheek but positive for his hands. The results of this test show that it is highly unlikely that Oswald had recently fired a gun. Also, no one had seen Oswald on the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository after 11:55 A.M. At roughly 12:31, 90 seconds after the shooting had taken place, Oswald was seen on the second floor of the building. This means that in under 90 seconds, Oswald would have